Comments on: Why I hate BlackBerries http://gorrie.org/2008/04/27/why-i-hate-blackberries/ bound to turn up Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:08:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Zach http://gorrie.org/2008/04/27/why-i-hate-blackberries/#comment-14086 Zach Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:11:46 +0000 http://gorrie.org/?p=306#comment-14086 I was recently forced, to my dismay, to buy a blackberry. To my surprise I have a hard time disliking it, at least compared to my other choices. GSM in the US sucks. Poor coverage, bad technology. About the only advantage GSM has is the ability to swap phones without involving the carrier and the ability to use non-US handsets without jumping through hoops. When I carried both an AT&T and a Sprint phone there was almost nowhere my AT&T phone had coverage but my Sprint phone didn't, but the reverse was not true. However, CDMA has crappy handsets. I was looking at getting another Palm OS device (great usability, crappy email, nonexistant push email,) a windows mobile device (crappy usability, crappy stability, but a great feature set, except that turning on push email makes the phone crash more) or a blackberry. The blackberry gets all the right things right. Email that works, that doesn't crash the phone. Seamless and quick integration with the company directory. The features that are there work. And the BES, which AFAIK no other handset has an equivalent to. The ability to locate the BES behind your firewall is the key point. This gives your users the ability to access resources on your internal network from their handset. No VPN client. No special configuration. Just type in URLs or open an ssh connection. If you're using a phone as a business tool and you're often out of the office, or you need 24/7 access to your network, this feature alone makes the BB hard to argue against. In most respects the BB is an exceedingly average phone. However, I can't really think of any area where I find it deficient, and aside from the BES nothing really stands out as a great distinguishing feature either. It just does what it's supposed to, in what should be an average way. The only reason it's not done in an average way is because most of the other phones on the market suck and crash a lot. I have yet to see my BB crash. I've been wondering what the state of all this is in Symbian land. Can I get push email while I'm sshing into a server and using my web browser all at the same time? I can with the BB, I can do it for a while with windows mobile (until the crash happens, at least) and I can't with palm os. I was recently forced, to my dismay, to buy a blackberry. To my surprise I have a hard time disliking it, at least compared to my other choices.

GSM in the US sucks. Poor coverage, bad technology. About the only advantage GSM has is the ability to swap phones without involving the carrier and the ability to use non-US handsets without jumping through hoops. When I carried both an AT&T and a Sprint phone there was almost nowhere my AT&T phone had coverage but my Sprint phone didn’t, but the reverse was not true.

However, CDMA has crappy handsets. I was looking at getting another Palm OS device (great usability, crappy email, nonexistant push email,) a windows mobile device (crappy usability, crappy stability, but a great feature set, except that turning on push email makes the phone crash more) or a blackberry.

The blackberry gets all the right things right. Email that works, that doesn’t crash the phone. Seamless and quick integration with the company directory. The features that are there work. And the BES, which AFAIK no other handset has an equivalent to.

The ability to locate the BES behind your firewall is the key point. This gives your users the ability to access resources on your internal network from their handset. No VPN client. No special configuration. Just type in URLs or open an ssh connection.

If you’re using a phone as a business tool and you’re often out of the office, or you need 24/7 access to your network, this feature alone makes the BB hard to argue against.

In most respects the BB is an exceedingly average phone. However, I can’t really think of any area where I find it deficient, and aside from the BES nothing really stands out as a great distinguishing feature either. It just does what it’s supposed to, in what should be an average way. The only reason it’s not done in an average way is because most of the other phones on the market suck and crash a lot. I have yet to see my BB crash.

I’ve been wondering what the state of all this is in Symbian land. Can I get push email while I’m sshing into a server and using my web browser all at the same time? I can with the BB, I can do it for a while with windows mobile (until the crash happens, at least) and I can’t with palm os.

]]>